Unofficial Problem Bank list declines to 930 Institutions

Very busy week for the Unofficial Problem Bank List because of failures and the FDIC releasing its enforcement actions through March. In all, there were 17 removals and eight additions that leave the list with 930 institutions with assets of $361.7 billion. A year ago, the list held 984 institutions with assets of $422.1 billion. At 930 institutions, it is the lowest weekly count since December 24, 2010 when 919 institutions were on the list. During April 2012, there were 16 additions and 34 removals including 25 action terminations, six failures, and three unassisted mergers. For the month, the institution count fell by 18 to 930 and assets dropped by $15.8 billion to $361.7 billion.

Five banks were closed this Friday, which is the most in one night since five were closed nearly a year ago on April 29, 2011. This week is the 17th of the year and, for the past five years, it has been the third most active for closings at 4.2 institutions after the 44th week (mid-November) at 4.75 closings and 30th week (late July) at 4.5 closings. Removals from failure this week include Plantation Federal Bank, Pawleys Island, SC ($486 million); Inter Savings Bank, fsb D/B/A Interbank, fsb, Maple Grove, MN ($482 million); Bank of the Eastern Shore, Cambridge, MD ($167 million); HarVest Bank of Maryland, Gaithersburg, MD ($164 million); Palm Desert National Bank, Palm Desert, CA ($126 million).

There was one unassisted merger -- Brazos Valley Bank, National Association, College Station, TX ($112 million), which merged with American Momentum Bank, Tampa, FL. Action terminations include Opus Bank, Irvine, CA ($2.4 billion); Heritage Oaks Bank, Paso Robles, CA ($983 million); North Valley Bank, Redding, CA ($901 million); Citizens Bank of Mukwonago, Mukwonago, WI ($651 million); Northeast Bank, Minneapolis, MN ($352 million); Union State Bank, Pell City, AL ($275 million); The Peoples State Bank, Ellettsville, IN ($177 million); Quoin Financial Bank, Miller, SD ($131 million), Clarke County State Bank, Osceola, IA ($110 million); Americas United Bank, Glendale, CA ($100 million); and First State Bank of Kiester, Kiester, MN.

This week there were eight additions including Hudson Valley Bank, National Association, Stamford, CT ($2.8 billion Ticker: HVB); Macon Bank, Inc., Franklin, NC ($874 million); State Bank of Countryside, Countryside, IL ($728 million); Omaha State Bank, Omaha, NE ($292 million); Friends Bank, New Smyrna Beach, FL ($123 million Ticker: FRIE); Peoples State Bank, Lake City, FL ($74 million); Waterman State Bank, Waterman, IL ($48 million); and Colorado Valley Bank, SSB, La Grange, TX ($30 million).

Other changes include Prompt Corrective Action Orders being issued against Truman Bank, St. Louis, MO ($315 million) and Syringa Bank, Boise, ID ($197 million).

Housing: The "Long Bottom"

From Nick Timiraos at the WSJ: Housing Ends Slide but Faces a Long Bottom

Nearly six years after home prices started falling, more U.S. housing markets appear to be nearing a new phase: a prolonged bottom.

Hitting a bottom, of course, isn't the same as a full-fledged recovery ... The good news is that housing construction and home sales appear to have hit a floor. Home builders cut back heavily in the past four years and began construction on just 434,000 single-family homes last year, the lowest level on record. Research firm Zelman & Associates estimates builders will start construction on 540,000 homes this year, a 24% increase.
...
Housing economists are debating whether that shadow inventory will spoil any housing recovery. "That'll be like a ball and chain," said Mark Fleming, chief economist at CoreLogic. "It won't prevent a recovery, but it could drag it out over several years."
...
Ms. Zelman ... said the shadow inventory is "not going to result in the double dip that people always talk about." She points to a burgeoning appetite for housing from investors, who are scooping up homes that can be converted to rentals, and six years of pent-up demand from traditional buyers who feel better about their financial prospects. "The fear is gone," she said.
...
While the foreclosure overhang is serious, some economists say there is a less-noticed tailwind that could balance things out: the sharp decline in new construction over the past four years. "A lot of the people who talk about 'shadow inventory' don't talk about how slow the overall housing stock has been growing," said Thomas Lawler, an independent housing economist

It appears housing starts, new home sales and residential investment have already bottomed and will increase in 2012. All three had a "long bottom" of several years.

I think house prices have "bottomed" too, but this is just the beginning of the bottoming process. I agree with Ms. Zelman that the "shadow inventory" will probably not push prices down further nationally (it probably will in some judicial foreclosure areas), but I think the "shadow inventory" will limit any price increases for some time.

Yesterday:
' Summary for Week ending April 27th
' Schedule for Week of April 29th
' The upward slope of Real House Prices

Personal Income increased 0.4% in March, Spending 0.3%

The BEA released the Personal Income and Outlays report for March:

Personal income increased $50.3 billion, or 0.4 percent ... in March, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Personal consumption expenditures (PCE) increased $29.6 billion, or 0.3 percent.
...
Real PCE -- PCE adjusted to remove price changes -- increased 0.1 percent in March, compared with an increase of 0.5 percent in February. ... PCE price index -- The price index for PCE increased 0.2 percent in March, compared with an increase of 0.3 percent in February. The PCE price index, excluding food and energy, increased 0.2 percent, compared with an increase of 0.1 percent.

The following graph shows real Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) through March (2005 dollars). Note that the y-axis doesn't start at zero to better show the change.

Click on graph for larger image.

PCE increased 0.3% in March, and real PCE increased 0.1%.

Note: The PCE price index, excluding food and energy, increased 0.2 percent.

The personal saving rate was at 3.8% in March.

As reported on Friday, PCE increased sharply in Q1 (PCE for January and February were revised up). Income in March was slightly better than expected.

Schedule for Week of April 29th

Earlier:
' Summary for Week Ending April 27th

The key report for this week will be the April employment report to be released on Friday, May 4th. Other key reports include the ISM manufacturing index and vehicle sales on Tuesday, and the ISM non-manufacturing (service) index on Thursday.

In Europe, the ECB meets on Thursday, and France and Greece hold elections next Sunday, May 6th.

Recovery Measures

By request, here is an update to four key indicators used by the NBER for business cycle dating: GDP, Employment, Industrial production and real personal income less transfer payments.

Note: The following graphs are all constructed as a percent of the peak in each indicator. This shows when the indicator has bottomed - and when the indicator has returned to the level of the previous peak. If the indicator is at a new peak, the value is 100%.

These graphs show that several major indicators are still significantly below the pre-recession peaks.

Click on graph for larger image.

This graph is for real GDP through Q1 2012. Real GDP returned to the pre-recession peak in Q3 2011, and has been at new post recession highs for three consecutive quarters.

At the worst point, real GDP was off 5.1% from the 2007 peak.

Real GDP has performed better than other indicators ...

This graph shows real personal income less transfer payments as a percent of the previous peak through February (March data will be released Monday).

This measure was off 10.7% at the trough.

Real personal income less transfer payments is still 4.2% below the previous peak.

The third graph is for industrial production through March.

Industrial production was off over 17% at the trough, and has been one of the stronger performing sectors during the recovery.

However industrial production is still 4.1% below the pre-recession peak.

The final graph is for employment. This is similar to the graph I post every month comparing percent payroll jobs lost in several recessions.

Payroll employment is still 3.8% below the pre-recession peak.

All of these indicators collapsed in 2008 and early 2009, and only real GDP is back to the pre-recession peak. It is possible that industrial production will be back to the pre-recession peak in early 2013, but employment and personal income less transfer payments have a long way to go.

Yesterday:
' Summary for Week ending April 27th
' Schedule for Week of April 29th
' The upward slope of Real House Prices

The upward slope of Real House Prices

A year ago, Dave Altig asked Just how out of line are house prices?. Dr. Altig's post featured both a price-to-rent graph and a real house price graph originally from the NY Times based on Professor Robert Shiller's work.

The price-to-rent ratio graph Dr Altig presented seemed to show that house prices were getting back to normal, but the graph based on Professor Shiller's work seemed to suggest that house prices could fall much further. Below is an updated graph from Shiller through Q4 2011.

The Shiller graph has suggested to many observers that house prices track inflation (i.e. that house prices adjusted for inflation are stable - except for bubbles). Last year I pointed out the slope depends on the data series used, and that if Professor Shiller had used either Corelogic or the Freddie Mac house prices series, before Case-Shiller was available, there would a greater upward slope to his graph.

An upward slope to real prices makes sense to me as I've argued before: "In many areas - if the population is increasing - house prices increase slightly faster than inflation over time, so there is an upward slope for real prices."

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This is the updated graph from Professor Shiller.

For the underlying data for the NY Times graphic, please see Professor Shiller's Irrational Exuberance website.

It is important to realize that Professor Shiller used the quarterly Case-Shiller National index starting in 1987. From 1975 through 1986 he used what is now called the FHFA index. He used other price indexes in earlier periods.

The second graph shows the National Case-Shiller real prices and the CoreLogic HPI real prices (adjusted for CPI just like Shiller). For Q1, I used the February Corelogic index value.

The FHFA index used by Shiller was based on a small percentage of transactions back in the '70s. If we look at the CoreLogic index instead, there is a clear upward slope to real house prices.

If Professor Shiller had used the Freddie Mac quarterly index back to 1970 (instead of the PHCPI), there would be more of an upward slope to his graph too. So it is important to understand that for earlier periods the data is probably less accurate.

The third graph shows the upward slope for both real price indexes. Even the Shiller "Irrational Exuberance" real price index has an upward slope (about 0.5% per year) - and the CoreLogic upward slope is steeper (about 1.5% per year).

Right now the real CoreLogic HPI is only slightly above the trend line (it could overshoot), and the Case-Shiller national index will probably be just above the trend line when the Q1 data is released.

This would suggest nominal prices are at the bottom (and real prices are close too). This is one reason I think the Case-Shiller and Corelogic house prices indexes probably stopped falling, NSA, in March 2012 (the March data will be released next month).

Earlier:
' Summary for Week ending April 27th
' Schedule for Week of April 29th

Summary for Week ending April 27th

The GDP report was weaker than expected with 2.2% real GDP growth annualized in Q1 (expectations were for 2.5%). This is disappointing growth, but final demand was a little better than overall GDP. Personal consumption expenditures increased at a 2.9% annual rate in Q1, and residential investment (RI) increased at a 19.1% annual rate. Weather probably boosted PCE and RI - and PCE growth at this rate is not sustainable without more income growth - but this was still decent.

Naturally most of the GDP commentary was pretty negative, but I was a little more sanguine. I expect some of the drag to diminish over the next couple of quarters - as an example, investment in non-residential structures was negative in Q1, however, based on the architecture billing index, I expect the drag from other non-residential categories (offices, malls) to end mid-year. And there was another negative contribution from government spending at all levels. However, it appears the drag from state and local governments will end mid-year (after declining for almost 3 years).

A bright spot - and perhaps the key story - is that residential investment is continuing to increase, and I expect this to continue all year (although the recovery in RI will still be sluggish compared to previous recoveries). Since RI is the best leading indicator for the economy, this suggests no recession this year. Still, overall, this was a weak GDP report.

The new home sales report for March was solid and is further confirmation that the recovery for the housing industry has started. New home sales are up about 17% from the weakest three month period during the housing bust. That is a significant improvement, even if the absolute levels are still very low. The debate is now about the strength of the recovery, not whether there is a recovery. My view is housing will remain sluggish for some time, and I expect 2012 to be another historically weak year, but better than 2011.

Another key report was the Case-Shiller house price index for February. This showed house prices fell to new post-bubble lows (I expect further declines in the March report), but we are starting to see some improvement in the year-over-year change. House prices are important for the economy, and I'm watching closely for signs that prices have stopped falling.

The NMHC Apartment index showed further tightening (suggesting falling vacancy rates and rising rents), and the consumer sentiment index increased. For manufacturing, the Richmond Fed index increased, however the Kansas City Fed manufacturing index showed slower growth.

Here is a summary in graphs:

' Real GDP increased at 2.2% annual rate in Q1

Click on graph for larger image.

The GDP report was weaker than expected, however, on a positive note, final demand was decent. Personal consumption expenditures increased at a 2.9% annual rate in Q1, and residential investment increased at a 19.1% annual rate. Weather probably provided a boost to GDP - and PCE growth at this rate is not sustainable without more income growth - but this was still decent.

Residential Investment as a percent of GDP is still near record lows, but it is increasing. Usually RI bounces back quickly following a recession, but this time there is a wide bottom because of the excess supply of existing vacant housing units.

Last year the increase in RI was mostly from multifamily and home improvement investment. Now the increase is probably from most categories including single family. I'll break down Residential Investment (RI) into components after the GDP details are released this coming week.

' New Home Sales in March at 328,000 Annual Rate

The Census Bureau reports New Home Sales in March were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 328 thousand. This was down from a revised 353 thousand SAAR in February (revised up sharply from 313 thousand). December and January were revised up too.

This graph shows New Home Sales vs. recessions since 1963. The dashed line is the current sales rate.

Starting in 1973 the Census Bureau broke inventory down into three categories: Not Started, Under Construction, and Completed.

This graph shows the three categories of inventory starting in 1973.

The inventory of completed homes for sale was at a record low 48,000 units in March. The combined total of completed and under construction is at the lowest level since this series started.

Even though sales are still very low, new home sales have clearly bottomed. New home sales have averaged 335 thousand SAAR over the last 5 months, after averaging under 300 thousand for the previous 18 months. All of the recent revisions have been up too. This was a solid report and above the consensus forecast.

Bank Failure #22: Palm Desert National Bank, Palm Desert, California

by CalculatedRisk on 4/27/2012 09:20:00 PM

Lack of Demand

by CalculatedRisk on 4/27/2012 11:05:00 PM

"Private money coming back into the housing finance market"

Mortgage broker Soylent Green is People sent me an example today of private money coming back into the mortgage market:

Second mortgage purchase mortgage lending above 80% loan to value has begun to creep back into the market. Prudent Underwriting standards and deep risk analysis have convinced some private money to come back into the housing finance market of late. We've added an 80 / 10 / 10 product recently that has no Private Mortgage Insurance.

700 FICO minimum.

SFD, and Condos - providing that the project has 75% Owner Occupancy ratios

90% CLTV to $750,000

Interest Only minimum payment HELOC, Prime + 1.99%. No prepayment penalty.

Qualifying at index, margin, plus .125, fully amortized.

45% Absolute debt to income ratio maximum.

Let's take a $333,400 priced home. Most FHA buyers will put less down, but for comparison purposes assume a 10 percent down payment. An FHA 30 fixed borrower pays 1.75% for the FHA Up Front Mortgage Insurance Premium PLUS 1.20% per year in Mortgage Insurance. Assuming a 3.75% rate and a $300,000 balance, the payment plus MI runs $1,690. A similarly structured Conventional Conforming loan at 3.875% runs $1,532 An 80/10/10 combined payment comes in at $1,437, principal and interest.

That's quite a payment spread for the typical home buyer to choose from. As more of these risk tolerant companies enter the market, the share of FHA loans will finally diminish.

CR note: As I mentioned yesterday, when house prices stop falling, private lenders will become more confident and reenter the market. This is just the beginning.

Some expanded prudent private lending makes sense, but we never want to see Alt-A and stated income loans again!

Contest Question: Will real GDP be above or below consensus?

For those entering the monthly contest ...

From MarketWatch: Q1 GDP report to show economy 'plugging along'

Economists polled by MarketWatch expect a 2.7% growth rate in the first quarter, slightly slower than the 3.0% rate in the fourth quarter.

There was a wide range of forecasts, from just above a 2% growth rate up to a 3.2%.

Bloomberg is showing the consensus at 2.5%.

Real GDP increased 2.2% annual rate in Q1

From the BEA:

Real gross domestic product -- the output of goods and services produced by labor and property located in the United States -- increased at an annual rate of 2.2 percent in the first quarter of 2012 (that is, from the fourth quarter to the first quarter), according to the "advance" estimate released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

The increase in real GDP in the first quarter primarily reflected positive contributions from personal consumption expenditures (PCE), exports, private inventory investment, and residential fixed investment that were partly offset by negative contributions from federal government spending, nonresidential fixed investment, and state and local government spending. Imports, which are a subtraction in the calculation of GDP, increased.

The deceleration in real GDP in the first quarter primarily reflected a deceleration in private inventory investment and a downturn in nonresidential fixed investment that were partly offset by accelerations in PCE and in exports.

Click on graph for larger image.

A few key numbers:
' Real personal consumption expenditures increased 2.9 percent in the first quarter, compared with an increase of 2.1 percent in the fourth.

' Investment growth slowed, except residential investment: "Real nonresidential fixed investment decreased 2.1 percent in the first quarter, in contrast to an increase of 5.2 percent in the fourth. Nonresidential structures decreased 12.0 percent, compared with a decrease of 0.9 percent. Equipment and software increased 1.7 percent, compared with an increase of 7.5 percent. Real residential fixed investment increased 19.1 percent, compared with an increase of 11.6 percent."

' Government spending continued to be a drag at all levels, but at a slower pace: "Real federal government consumption expenditures and gross investment decreased 5.6 percent in the first quarter, compared with a decrease of 6.9 percent in the fourth. ... Real state and local government consumption expenditures and gross investment decreased 1.2 percent, compared with a decrease of 2.2 percent."

This was below expectations. I'll have more on GDP later ...

San Francisco Rents "On a tear"

by CalculatedRisk on 4/25/2012 08:35:00 PM

RealtyTrac: Foreclosure activity mixed in Q1

From RealtyTrac: 54 Percent of U.S. Metros Post Quarterly Increase in Foreclosure Activity in First Quarter of 2012

First quarter foreclosure activity increased from the previous quarter in 26 out of the nation's 50 largest metro areas, led by Pittsburgh (up 49 percent), Indianapolis (up 37 percent), Philadelphia (up 30 percent), New York (up 24 percent), Raleigh, N.C. (up 23 percent), and Virginia Beach, Va. (up 22 percent).

The biggest quarterly decreases in foreclosure activity among the 50 largest metro areas were in Portland, Ore. (down 28 percent), Las Vegas (down 26 percent), Providence, R.I. (down 24 percent), Salt Lake City (down 22 percent), Boston (down 21 percent), and San Jose, Calif. (down 21 percent).

'First quarter metro foreclosure trends were a mixed bag,' said Brandon Moore, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac. 'While the majority of metro areas continued to show foreclosure activity down from a year ago, more than half reported increasing foreclosure activity from the previous quarter ' an early sign that long-dormant foreclosures are coming out of hibernation in many local markets.'

Click on graph for larger image.

This graph from RealtyTrac shows some market are seeing an increase in foreclosure activity and others a decrease.

RealtyTrac doesn't mention this, but Pennsylvania, Indiana, New York and North Carolina are all judicial states (the top 5 metro increases were in those states).

The states with the largest decreases in foreclosure activity - Oregon, Nevada, Rhode Island, Utah, Massachusetts, and California - are all non-judicial states.

This really is a tale of two different foreclosure methods. Many of the judicial states still have a long way to go.

Weekly Initial Unemployment Claims at 388,000

The DOL reports:

In the week ending April 21, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 388,000, a decrease of 1,000 from the previous week's revised figure of 389,000. The 4-week moving average was 381,750, an increase of 6,250 from the previous week's revised average of 375,500.

The previous week was revised up to 389,000 from 386,000.

The following graph shows the 4-week moving average of weekly claims since January 2000.

Click on graph for larger image.

The dashed line on the graph is the current 4-week average. The four-week average of weekly unemployment claims increased to 381,750.

This is the highest level for the 4-week moving average this year.

And here is a long term graph of weekly claims:

After falling to 363,000 at the end of March, the 4-week average has increased for three straight weeks and is at the highest level this year.

Misc: California 99ers Lose 20 Weeks, Richmond Fed index increases, FHFA House Prices increase year-over-year

A few miscellaneous articles ...

' From Kathleen Pender at the San Francisco Chronicle: California Fed-Ed jobless benefits to end mid-May

Starting in mid-May, no one in California can begin or continue receiving this final round of federal benefits, known as Fed-Ed in California and Extended Benefits elsewhere.

About 90,000 Californians are receiving Fed-Ed. Their benefits will end abruptly in mid-May, even if they still have weeks remaining in their Fed-Ed claim.

The program's end will reduce the maximum weeks of unemployment to 79 from 99 for most people in California, although a small segment can get up to 89.

Update: California has one of the highest state unemployment rates at 11%, so it seemed a little weird that California workers would lose the Fed-Ed benefits. However, aocording to the Record Searchlight (ht josap), the Fed-Ed program requires that the unemployment rate be "10% higher than it was during the same three-month period during one of the last three years".

' Earlier today from the Richmond Fed: Manufacturing Activity Picks Up the Pace in April; Expectations Remain Upbeat

In April, the seasonally adjusted composite index of manufacturing activity ' our broadest measure of manufacturing ' advanced seven points to 14 from March's reading of 7. ... The manufacturing employment index moved up four points to end at 10, and the average workweek indicator edged up one point to 3. The wage index added three points to 14.

This was slightly above expectations of a reading of 8.

' From the FHFA: FHFA House Price Index Up 0.3 Percent in February

U.S. house prices rose 0.3 percent on a seasonally adjusted basis from January to February, according to the Federal Housing Finance Agency's monthly House Price Index. ... For the 12 months ending in February, U.S. prices rose 0.4 percent, the first 12-month increase since the July 2006 - July 2007 interval.

The FHFA monthly index is for Fannie and Freddie loans only. Fannie and Freddie have significantly lower default rates than the overall market, and that probably has helped stabilize this index.

On March New Home Sales:
' New Home Sales in March at 328,000 Annual Rate
' Comments on Housing and "Distressing Gap" Graph ' New Home Sales graphs

On House Prices:
' Case Shiller: House Prices fall to new post-bubble lows in February NSA
' Real House Prices and Price-to-Rent Ratio at late '90s Levels
' House Price graphs

Philly Fed State Coincident Indexes increased in March

From the Philly Fed:

The Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia has released the coincident indexes for the 50 states for March 2012. In the past month, the indexes increased in 48 states, decreased in one state (Rhode Island), and remained stable in one state (South Dakota), for a one-month diffusion index of 94. Over the past three months, the indexes increased in all 50 states, for a three-month diffusion index of 100.

Note: These are coincident indexes constructed from state employment data. From the Philly Fed:

The coincident indexes combine four state-level indicators to summarize current economic conditions in a single statistic. The four state-level variables in each coincident index are nonfarm payroll employment, average hours worked in manufacturing, the unemployment rate, and wage and salary disbursements deflated by the consumer price index (U.S. city average). The trend for each state's index is set to the trend of its gross domestic product (GDP), so long-term growth in the state's index matches long-term growth in its GDP.

Click on graph for larger image.

This is a graph is of the number of states with one month increasing activity according to the Philly Fed. This graph includes states with minor increases (the Philly Fed lists as unchanged).

In March, 49 states had increasing activity, up from 47 in February. The number of states with increasing activity has been at or above 47 for the last seven consecutive months.

Here is a map of the three month change in the Philly Fed state coincident indicators. This map was all red during the worst of the recession.

Now the map is all green. The recovery may be sluggish, but it is widespread geographically.

On March New Home Sales:
' New Home Sales in March at 328,000 Annual Rate
' Comments on Housing and "Distressing Gap" Graph ' New Home Sales graphs

On House Prices:
' Case Shiller: House Prices fall to new post-bubble lows in February NSA
' Real House Prices and Price-to-Rent Ratio at late '90s Levels
' House Price graphs

MBA: Mortgage Purchase activity increased slightly, Refinance activity declined, Record Low Mortgage Rates

by CalculatedRisk on 4/25/2012 08:39:00 AM

DOT: Vehicle Miles Driven increased 1.8% in February

The Department of Transportation (DOT) reported:

Travel on all roads and streets changed by +1.8% (3.9 billion vehicle miles) for February 2012 as compared with February 2011. Travel for the month is estimated to be 216.1 billion vehicle miles..

The following graph shows the rolling 12 month total vehicle miles driven.

Even with the year-over-year increase in February, the rolling 12 month total is mostly moving sideways.

Click on graph for larger image.

In the early '80s, miles driven (rolling 12 months) stayed below the previous peak for 39 months.

Currently miles driven has been below the previous peak for 51 months - and still counting.

The second graph shows the year-over-year change from the same month in the previous year.

This is the third consecutive month with a year-over-year increase in miles driven - for the first time since 2010.

Even though gasoline prices are up sharply over the last few of months, prices also increased quickly last year in March and April - so we might not see a year-over-year decline in miles driven in the coming months.

The lack of growth in miles driven over the last 4+ years is probably due to a combination of factors: the great recession and the lingering effects, the high price of gasoline - and the aging of the overall population. HS Dent has a graph of gasoline demand by age (see page 13 of Age of Consumer demand curves based on Census Bureau data) (ht Doug Short) - so this is probably, at least partially, another impact from the aging of the baby boomers (ht Brian).

Lawler: Early Builder Reports Point to 'Pretty Decent' Spring Selling Season, Contest Questions

From economist Tom Lawler:

NVR Inc, the fourth largest US home builder in 2010, reported last week that net home orders in the quarter ended March 31, 2012 totaled 3,157, up 31.4% from the comparable quarter of 2011. The company's sales cancellation rate, expressed as a % of gross orders, was 10.3% last quarter, down form 12.3% a year ago. Home closings totaled 1,924 last quarter, up 17.7% from the comparable quarter of last year, while the company's order backlog on 3/31/12 was 4,909, up 33.2% from last March.

D.R. Horton, the largest home builder in the US, reported today that net home orders in the quarter ended March 31, 2012 totaled 5,899, up 19.3% from the comparable quarter of 2011. The company's sales cancellation rate, expressed as a % of gross orders, was 22% last quarter, down from 25% a year ago. Home closings totaled 4,240, up 20.6% from the comparable quarter of last year, while the company's order backlog on 3/31/12 was 6,189, up 17.2% from a year ago.

Chairman of the Board Don Horton noted that the company's strong sales pace had 'continued through the first of April.'

There are been few scattered reports from other, smaller home builders that the current spring selling season has been significantly better than last year, The Ryland Group, PulteGroup, Meritage Homes, and M/I Homes report earnings and operating results for the quarter ended 3/31/12 on April 26.

The Commerce Department's February report on new SF homes showed YTD new SF home sales (not seasonally adjusted) up by just 8.2% from the comparable period of 2011. The March new SF home sales report is due out tomorrow. While correlations between builder reports and Census new SF sales are not that strong, right now I'd guess that there is significant 'upside surprise' to tomorrow.

Two Convicted of Mortgage Fraud in San Diego

These people didn't think they'd get caught? And how did they earn $350,000 in fees on $8 million in loans? That sure seems excessive.

From Eric Wolff at the North County Times: Carlsbad mother and Orange County son convicted in $8 million mortgage fraud

A jury convicted a Carlsbad mother and her Orange County son of an $8 million mortgage fraud scheme, the U.S. Attorney for Southern California said Wednesday.

Stephen Chrysler, an Orange County attorney and loan broker, and his mother, Aida Agusti Castro, a Carlsbad real estate agent living in Cardiff, inflated clients incomes on loan mortgages to buy 16 properties in Escondido, Oceanside, San Marcos, Lakeside and Menifee over 25 months from 2005 to 2007 to create false loans, which in turn netted the pair $350,000 in fees.
...
Castro and Chrysler located their clients through advertising in Spanish-language publications. They then inflated their clients' incomes so the clients could purchase more expensive houses, which in turn inflated Castro and Chrysler's fees. In order to persuade lenders, the pair had to fake businesses, management companies, tenants and rental histories.
...
The pair then told clients to sign the loan documents without reading them, and they often refused to translate the documents from English to Spanish.

Now they will get free rent at the Big House.

Eurozone Worries Again

A few stories:

From the Financial Times: Eurozone angst spooks investors

Markets reacted nervously on Monday to the socialists' first-round victory in France's presidential election, as the eurozone crisis claimed another victim on Monday with the collapse of the Dutch government.
excerpt with permission

From the WSJ: Euro-Zone's Private Sector Shrinking Fast

The euro zone's private sector contracted in April at the sharpest pace since November, damaged by a steep decline in the manufacturing sector, suggesting the region won't rebound quickly from the recession recent data are pointing to.

The preliminary composite PMI for the euro zone slumped to 47.4 in April from March's 49.1, Markit's preliminary purchasing managers' index showed Monday. The April manufacturing PMI slipped to 46 from March's 47.7 while the services PMI also declined to 47.9 from 49.2 over the same period ...

From the WSJ: Spain's Economy Dwindling

Spain's central bank said Monday that the country's economy contracted 0.4% in the first quarter from the fourth, evidence that a worsening downturn is making it tougher for Madrid to reach ambitious austerity targets.

On an annual basis, the economy contracted 0.5%, the first negative reading after seven-consecutive quarters of modest growth, the Bank of Spain said in its monthly economic report. This marks the official end of a mild recovery between late 2010 and late 2011 ...

From the WSJ: Hilsenrath's FOMC Preview

This is very similar to my FOMC Meeting Preview this morning.

From Jon Hilsenrath at the WSJ: A Forecast of What the Fed Will Do: Stand Pat

The changing forecast will be one of the most important topics of discussion at the central bank's policy meeting Tuesday and Wednesday, when officials will update their quarterly economic projections.
...
The new forecasts could project a little more inflation in 2012 than the Fed forecast in January, thanks in part to a recent rise in gasoline prices. It could also project a little less unemployment for 2012, thanks to recent declines in the jobless rate.
...
But the overall growth outlook for 2012 doesn't seem to have changed much from a few months ago.
...
Against the backdrop of a little more inflation and a little less unemployment than expected in the short-run, a scattering of officials might say that short-term interest rates should go up sooner than they projected in January to forestall a run-up in consumer prices.
...
But with many officials still doubtful about the durability of the recovery and expecting inflation to recede, the broader view at the Fed seems likely to favor sticking to their plan to keep rates low until late 2014.

Also on "QE", Paul Krugman has two short comments: What We Talk About When We Talk About QE and QE Or Not QE, That Is The Question. I frequently point out in the comments that the Fed is buying agency MBS, not private label garbage. Apparently there is widespread misunderstanding on this point. Krugman writes:

Reading a few comments, I think it's really important to emphasize that the Fed is only buying agency mortgage-backed securities ' that is, the stuff that already has an implicit Federal guarantee. A lot of readers seem to think that the Fed is buying subprime MBS or something like that, handing over money for worthless paper. Not so.

Earlier:
' Summary for Week Ending April 20th
' Schedule for Week of April 22nd

Sunday Night Futures

From the NY Times: Hollande and Sarkozy Head to Runoff in French Race

The Socialist candidate, François Hollande, won a narrow victory in Sunday's first round of France's presidential elections, riding promises of economic growth and a general dislike for the incumbent, Nicolas Sarkozy, into a favorable position before a runoff with Mr. Sarkozy on May 6.

The strong showing by the left and anger on the political extremes seemed to reflect a desire for change in France after 17 years of centrist, conservative presidents. And it could continue an anti-incumbency trend that began with the economic crisis in Western Europe, where center-right governments dominate from Britain to Spain to Germany.

It may also represent the first stirrings of a challenge to the German-dominated narrative of the euro crisis, which holds that public debt and runaway spending are the main culprits and that austerity must precede growth.

It sounds link Hollande is leading right now. The election in Greece is also scheduled for May 6th.

The Asian markets are mostly red tonight. The Nikkei is down about 0.3%, but the Shanghai Composite is up 0.5%.

From CNBC: Pre-Market Data and Bloomberg futures: the S&P 500 futures are down slightly, and Dow futures are down 20.

Oil: WTI futures are down to $103.81 (this is down from $109.77 in February) and Brent is up to $118.79 per barrel.

Earlier:
' Summary for Week Ending April 20th
' Schedule for Week of April 22nd
' FOMC Meeting Preview

Schedule for Week of April 22nd

Earlier:
' Summary for Week Ending April 20th

The key U.S. economic report for the coming week is the Q1 advance GDP report to be released on Friday. Also New Home sales and the Case-Shiller house price index will be released on Tuesday.

The Fed's FOMC holds a two day meeting on Tuesday and Wednesday, and Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke will hold a press conference following the FOMC announcement on Wednesday. The FOMC will release participants' projections of the appropriate target federal funds rate along with the quarterly economic projections.

Unofficial Problem Bank list declines to 939 Institutions

As expected, the OCC released its enforcement action activity through mid-March this week, which contributed to many changes to the Unofficial Problem Bank List. In all, there were 12 removals and seven additions that result in the list having 939 institutions with assets of $365.6 billion. A year ago, the list held 976 institutions with assets of $422.2 billion.

The removals, which are centered in Texas, Michigan, and Minnesota, include 10 action terminations, one failure, and one unassisted merger. Action terminations include Citizens Bank, Flint MI ($9.2 billion Ticker: CRBC); Sterling Bank and Trust, FSB, Southfield, MI ($762 million); The Central National Bank of Alva, Alva, OK ($276 million); First National Bank of Jasper, Jasper, TX ($222 million); First National Bank Minnesota, St. Peter, MN ($190 million); Northwestern Bank, National Association, Dilworth, MN ($138 million); Texas Heritage National Bank, Daingerfield, TX ($109 million); Peoples National Bank Leadville, Leadville, CO ($50 million); Uvalde National Bank, Uvalde, TX ($30 million); and Flint River National Bank, Camilla, GA ($27 million). The failure removal was Fort Lee Federal Savings Bank, FSB, Fort Lee, NJ ($52 million) and the other removal was American Bank of Texas, National Association, Marble Falls, TX ($775 million), which merged on unassisted basis.

The seven additions were Tulsa National Bank, Tulsa, OK ($175 million); Choice Bank, Oshkosh, WI ($175 million Ticker: CBKW); The First National Bank of Absecon, Absecon, NJ ($160 million Ticker: ASCN); Flatbush Federal Savings and Loan Association, Brooklyn, NY ($143 million Ticker: FLTB); Atlas Bank, Brooklyn, NY ($108 million); Mojave Desert Bank, National Association, Mojave, CA ($105 million Ticker: MOJA); and Auburn Savings Bank, FSB, Auburn, ME ($78 million Ticker: ABBB).

Other changes include Prompt Corrective Action orders issued against Citizens First National Bank, Princeton, IL ($1.0 billion Ticker: PNBC) and Security Bank, National Association, North Lauderdale, FL ($95 million). Next week, we anticipate the FDIC will release its enforcement action activity through March 2012.

FT Alphaville: FOMC pre-preview

by CalculatedRisk on 4/20/2012 09:27:00 PM

Bank Failure #17 in 2012: Fort Lee Federal Savings Bank, FSB, Fort Lee, NJ

by CalculatedRisk on 4/20/2012 06:14:00 PM

Summary for Week ending April 20th

For a few months the incoming data was above expectations. This was a combination of somewhat stronger reports and very low expectations. Since then expectations have increased, and the data has been a little weaker - so the data has been mostly below expectations for several weeks now. This doesn't suggest a sharp slowdown, just more sluggish growth as the economy continues to recover from the financial crisis, and as household continue to deleverage.

This was another week of somewhat disappointing data, a key exception being very strong retail sales in March. Housing starts declined in March, although the decline was mostly due to the volatile multi-family sector (and permits were up suggesting a bounce back next month). Existing home sales were below expectations, but inventory was down again ' and is now down 21.8% year-over-year. Weekly initial unemployment claims declined, but the overall level is still fairly high.

Here is a summary in graphs:

' Housing Starts declined in March

Click on graph for larger image.

Total housing starts were at 654 thousand (SAAR) in March, down 5.8% from the revised February rate of 694 thousand (SAAR). Note that February was revised down from 698 thousand.

Single-family starts declined 0.2% to 462 thousand in March. February was revised up to 463 thousand from 457 thousand.

Total starts are up 37% from the bottom, and single family starts are up 31% from the low.

This was well below expectations of 700 thousand starts in March, but mostly because of multi-family starts.

Homeowner Financial Obligation Ratio near normal, Mortgage obligations still high

From Floyd Norris at the NY Times: Debt Burden Lifting, Consumers Open Wallets a Crack

One measure of the financial health of householders is the level of financial obligations, like required mortgage and credit card payments, to disposable income. By the fall of 2007, those obligations took up 14 percent of disposable income, more than at any time since the Federal Reserve began calculating the statistic in 1980.

But now the situation has turned around. The latest figures, for the final quarter of 2011, show that required debt service payments now make up just 10.9 percent of disposable income, the lowest proportion since 1994. A broader measure ' which adds in such obligations as property tax and insurance premiums for homeowners, and rent for those who do not own their homes ' has fallen to the lowest level since 1984.

There is little mystery in how that happened. First, debt levels have fallen. ... Second, low interest rates mean that servicing that debt costs less. ...

Getting those debt levels down was not a simple matter of making payments, of course. The McKinsey Global Institute estimates that about two-thirds of the reduction came from the cancellation of debt, through write-offs and foreclosures.

Norris is referring to the Debt Service Ratio (DSR) from the Federal Reserve.

I also like to look at the Financial Obligation Ratio (FOR) for homeowners.

Note: This series is useful to look for changes over time, but there are limitations. From the Fed:

The limitations of current sources of data make the calculation of the ratio especially difficult. The ideal data set for such a calculation would have the required payments on every loan held by every household in the United States. Such a data set is not available, and thus the calculated series is only a rough approximation of the current debt service ratio faced by households. Nonetheless, this rough approximation may be useful if, by using the same method and data series over time, it generates a time series that captures the important changes in household debt service payments.

Click on graph for larger image.

This graph shows the Total, Mortgage and Consumer financial obligation ratios for homeowners.

With some decline in debt, and much lower interest rates, the total homeowner financial obligations ratio is back to normal levels. However the mortgage ratio - even with record low mortgage rates - is still somewhat high.

Back in the early '90s, following the previous surge in mortgage obligations, the mortgage ratio declined for about 9 years. For the mortgage ratio to decline further, it would take a combination of more debt reduction and - hopefully - more disposable income.

Spanish 10 year bond yields near 6%

From Dow Jones: Italian, Spanish Bonds Suffer As Crisis Fears Mount

Italian and Spanish government bond prices continued to fall early Friday after Thursday's Spanish bond auction failed to inspire renewed confidence in peripheral markets, while French bonds also suffered ahead of Sunday's presidential election. ... Italian 10-year bond yields climbed 10 basis points to 5.68%, while Spanish yields were up 10 basis points at 5.97%, according to Tradeweb. German 10-year bund yields were at 1.61%, having briefly hit a record low of just below 1.6%, while French 10-year yields climbed four basis points to 3.11%.

Here are the Spanish and Italian 10-year yields from Bloomberg. Both are still well below the highs of last November. Both the election in France, and the election in Greece scheduled for May 6th, are making investors uneasy. Sarkozy will probably lose in a runoff, and the smaller parties in Greece will probably do very well. At some point current policies will not survive at the ballot box.

State and Local Government Payroll Employment Stabilizing?

A few months ago I wrote:

It is looking like there will be less drag from state and local governments in 2012, and that most of the drag will be over by the end of Q2 (end of FY 2012). This doesn't mean state and local government will add to GDP in the 2nd half of 2012, just that the drag on GDP and employment will probably end. Just getting rid of the drag will help.

It is time for an update - it is early in the year, but it is possible the employment drag from state and local governments has already ended. In fact, state and local government have added 14 thousand jobs since December.

Click on graph for larger image.

This graph shows total state and government payroll employment since January 2007. Note: Some of the stimulus spending from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act probably kept state and local employment from declining faster in 2009.

Of course the Federal government is still losing workers (53,000 over the last year), but it looks like state and local government employment is stabilizing.

Some thoughts on housing and foreclosures

Some musings ... One of the "givens" for 2012 is that the number of foreclosures will increase following the mortgage servicer settlement agreement. But I've been wondering just how big that increase will be...

A key recent development is the decline in distressed sales; distressed sales are a combination of short sales and lender real estate owned (REO) sales. I've been tracking this for a couple of years, at first just using data for Sacramento, and more recently data for several other cities too (compiled by Tom Lawler). This data shows two important trends: 1) overall distressed sales have been declining, and 2) there has been a shift from REO sales to short sales.

Of course the percent of overall distressed sales could, and probably will, increase soon now that the mortgage settlement agreement has been signed off. But the increase might be less than many people expect. Here are a few reasons:

' According to LPS, there are currently about 2 million properties in the foreclosure process and another 1.7 million loans 90+ delinquent. However many of these loans are in judicial states, and even with the mortgage settlement, it will take some time to work through the courts. So it is hard to imagine a huge wave of foreclosures, if anything it will be more like a sustained high tide in certain judicial foreclosure areas.

' Meanwhile the lenders are offering cash incentives to these same borrowers to do short sales. These incentives are one of the reasons short sales are now at about the same level as REO sales according to LPS. Just yesterday Fannie and Freddie announced new short sale timelines to try to streamline this process further. Sure short sales are still distressed sales, but the impact of short sales on the market is probably less than foreclosures. And more short sales will reduce the number of REOs on the market (listed inventory is what impacts prices).

' Meanwhile the GSEs are trying a new REO-to-rental pilot program, and the regulators are allowing banks to hold REOs as rentals for an extended period. This will probably also reduce the number of REOs hitting the market in the near future. These properties will eventually hit the market, but that is more an argument for why prices will not rise quickly as opposed to prices falling further.

' At the same time, the HARP refinance program is aimed at underwater borrowers who are current on their loan. These borrowers have been making payments for some time, and a new lower mortgage rate will incentivize them to keep paying their mortgage (and also reduce the time until the borrowers have positive equity). This will reduce the pipeline of new delinquencies. HARP is still ramping up, but the number of HARP refinance applications is up sharply according to the MBA.

All and all, I think the number of foreclosures listed for sale might be less than some people expect.

The distressed sales data that I post monthly will probably tell us the size of the wave. But this reminds me a little of the Option ARM issue a few years ago. At first everyone thought there would be a flood of new foreclosures when Option ARMs reset ' but over time it became apparent that many borrowers defaulted before the reset, had received a modification, or had refinanced ' and there was no flood of reset related defaults.

Last year, for housing, the key was the decline in inventory (something I've been watching closely for the last couple of years). This year inventory is still critical, but any change in the level of distressed sales will be especially important. Just jotting down some thoughts ...

Lawler: Evaluation of Gross Vacancy Rates From the 2010 Census Versus Current Surveys

CR note: This is an important topic on trying to understand the number of excess vacant housing units in the US. Unfortunately the various surveys do not match up with the decennial Census data. It appears the vacancy rates in the HVS survey are way too high - yet this is the data most analysts use to estimate the excess number of vacant housing units! In other words, most reported estimates are way too high. The good news is the Census Bureau is trying to understand why ...

From economist Tom Lawler (Lawler identified this issue and pushed for this review):

The Census Bureau posted the following paper presented at the January 2012 meeting of the Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology, and folks interested in the topic should read it.

"Evaluation of Gross Vacancy Rates From the 2010 Census Versus Current Surveys: Early Findings from Comparisons with the 2010 Census and the 2010 ACS 1-Year Estimates" by Arthur R Cresce, Ph. D., Assistant Division Chief for Housing Characteristics, Social, Economic and Housing Statistics Division,
U.S. Census Bureau, SEHSD Working Paper Number 2012-07

Here is an excerpt of the purpose of the paper.

"This paper is part of a larger effort to understand why there are differences in the level of occupied and vacant housing units among the 2010 Census, the 2010 American Community Survey (ACS), the Current Population Survey/Housing Vacancy Survey1 (HVS), and the American Housing Survey2 (AHS). The specific focus of this paper is to provide a snapshot of research completed to date on factors that might explain differences in the level of vacant and occupied housing units between the 2010 Census and 2010 American Community Survey (ACS). Thus, this paper is not intended to answer all questions or issues concerning these differences. The 2010 ACS 1-year estimate for the gross vacancy rate (GVR) was 13.1 percent compared to 11.4 percent for the 2010 Census. We expect to produce a more comprehensive report on the 2010 Census ' ACS differences in 2012 with additional reports to address the differences between the 2010 Census, the HVS and AHS. The goals of these reports are: 1) to understand better why these totals differ and 2) to address particular factors, where possible, that might lead to more consistent results across data collection efforts in the future.'

As noted above, this paper focuses on the decennial Census gross vacancy rates and the 2010 ACS gross vacancy rates. The paper notes, however, that Census analysts are also focusing on decennial Census vacancy rates vs. the HVS vacancy rates, as the below excerpt indicates.

'We plan to produce a series of reports in 2012 that will provide a more in depth analysis of potential factors that could explain the reasons for these differences, not only between the ACS and the census, but also among the ACS, the census and the Housing Vacancy Survey. From these reports, we hope to draw conclusions that will enable us, where possible, to take specific actions that could help provide more consistent results between the ACS and the census and, in general, among all our current surveys.'

Here are some summary conclusions from the paper.

'1. Although the census and the ACS have different reference periods and different residence rules, we do not believe differences in the reference period and residence rules were major contributors to the overall difference in the gross vacancy rates. However, problems can arise when implementing reference periods combined with residence rules. In the 2010 census, vacant housing units were enumerated in either Nonresponse Followup (NRFU) or in Vacant Delete Check (VDC) which was at least two months after Census Day. This enumeration of the Census Day reference date can make the determination of occupancy status problematic. FRs in the ACS and census enumerators can also misunderstand or misapply a usual residence or current residence rule.

'2. Response categories for occupancy status and vacancy status are similar between the ACS and the 2010 Census, but the way the questions are asked are different. It is not clear, though, if this played a role in explaining some of the differences in classification of housing units.

'3. The 2010 ACS sample was not drawn from the 2010 Census, which may help to explain at least a portion of the difference between the ACS and census GVRs.

'4. Large differences in the reporting of 'Other' vacancy status and a possible connection between difficulty in obtaining a response (as measured by percent CAPI in the ACS and 'hard-to-count' scores in the census) and differences in the GVR may provide some clues to understanding these differences.

'5. The census implemented coverage improvement procedures, such as special methods to review and confirm the status of housing, which are unique to the census and are not implemented in the ACS. The VDC operation in 2010 resulted in a net decrease of about 537 thousand vacant units.

'6. It was clear from debriefings with interviewers that they faced a very difficult task, Despite common procedures, differences in interpretation of what is an occupied unit can occur, especially in hard to count areas and, in general, in areas experiencing large numbers of foreclosures. Determining the occupancy status of a unit is especially hard in some areas when no household members can be contacted and neighbors are unwilling to provide information. '

Net, the paper suggests that the aggregate ACS vacancy rates for 2010 were probably 'too high,' though by how much varied significantly by area/region.

Since the Housing Vacancy Survey vacancy rates were well above the ACS vacancy rates, the implication is that the HVS vacancy rates are substantially overstated. However, why the HVS vacancy rates are way too high is still being investigated.

Census currently plans to release the HVS for the first quarter of 2012 at the end of April, though it is not clear why!

Weekly Initial Unemployment Claims at 386,000

The DOL reports:

In the week ending April 14, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 386,000, a decrease of 2,000 from the previous week's revised figure of 388,000. The 4-week moving average was 374,750, an increase of 5,500 from the previous week's revised average of 369,250.

The previous week was revised up to 388,000 from 380,000. Claims for two weeks ago were revised down.

The following graph shows the 4-week moving average of weekly claims since January 2000.

Click on graph for larger image.

The dashed line on the graph is the current 4-week average. The four-week average of weekly unemployment claims increased to 374,750.

This is the highest level for the 4-week moving average since January.

And here is a long term graph of weekly claims:

The recent upward increase in claims isn't large, but it is concerning.

Housing Starts decline in March

From the Census Bureau: Permits, Starts and Completions

Housing Starts:
Privately-owned housing starts in March were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 654,000. This is 5.8 percent (±15.6%)* below the revised February estimate of 694,000, but is 10.3 percent (±14.6%)* above the March 2011 rate of 593,000.

Single-family housing starts in March were at a rate of 462,000; this is 0.2 percent (±12.6%)* below the revised February figure of 463,000. The March rate for units in buildings with five units or more was 178,000.

Building Permits:
Privately-owned housing units authorized by building permits in March were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 747,000. This is 4.5 percent (±1.1%) above the revised February rate of 715,000 and is 30.1 percent (±1.6%) above the March 2011 estimate of 574,000.

Single-family authorizations in March were at a rate of 462,000; this is 3.5 percent (±1.1%) below the revised February figure of 479,000. Authorizations of units in buildings with five units or more were at a rate of 262,000 in March.

Click on graph for larger image.

Total housing starts were at 654 thousand (SAAR) in March, down 5.8% from the revised February rate of 694 thousand (SAAR). Note that February was revised down from 698 thousand.

Single-family starts declined 0.2% to 462 thousand in March. February was revised up to 463 thousand from 457 thousand.

The second graph shows total and single unit starts since 1968.

This shows the huge collapse following the housing bubble, and that total housing starts have been increasing lately after sideways for about two years and a half years.

Total starts are up 37% from the bottom, and single family starts are up 31% from the low.

This was well below expectations of 700 thousand starts in March, but mostly because of multi-family starts.

LA area Port Traffic increases in March, Exports hit new record

The following graphs are for inbound and outbound traffic at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach in TEUs (TEUs: 20-foot equivalent units or 20-foot-long cargo container).

Container traffic gives us an idea about the volume of goods being exported and imported - and possibly some hints about the trade report for March. LA area ports handle about 40% of the nation's container port traffic.

To remove the strong seasonal component for inbound traffic, the first graph shows the rolling 12 month average.

Click on graph for larger image.

On a rolling 12 month basis, inbound traffic is up 0.9% from February, and outbound traffic is up 0.2%.

The rolling 12 months of imports started declining last year - and exports seemed to stall. But it now appears both imports and exports are increasing again (slightly).

The 2nd graph is the monthly data (with a strong seasonal pattern for imports).

For the month of March, loaded outbound traffic was up 2.6% compared to March 2011, and loaded inbound traffic was up 12.8% compared to March 2011.

This is a new record for exports (just above the pre-recession peak).

Note: Every year imports decline in February mostly because of the Chinese New Year and rebounds in March. February 2012 was an especially steep decline, and some of the February traffic was probably pushed into March.

Lawler: Early Read on Existing Home Sales in March

CR Note: Some interesting comments from Tom Lawler ...

From economist Tom Lawler: Early Read on Existing Home Sales in March: Not Much Change (SAAR) from February, but Aggregate Numbers Miss Strengthening Market

While I'm missing reports from several key markets, my current estimate based on regional tracking is that US existing home sales as estimated by the National Association of Realtors ran at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.59 million in March, unchanged from February's pace, and up 7.7% from last March's seasonally adjusted pace. While the 'flattish' sales in March relative to February (on a SAAR basis) might seem surprising to some given various anecdotal stories of strengthening markets, the 'flat' reading does NOT negate the validity of many of these reports. Rather, a major reason for the 'disappointing' sales readings for March (and February) relative to a year ago is the substantial decline in REO/foreclosure sales, which to a large extent is the result of sharply lower REO properties for sale.

Consider, e.g., sales reports from the Vegas, Phoenix, Sacramento, Minneapolis, Mid-Atlantic, and Orlando markets broken out by short sales, foreclosure sales, and 'non-distressed' sales, shown on the table below.

Residential Remodeling Index increases 3% in February

From BuildFax:

Residential remodels authorized by building permits in the United States in February were at a seasonally-adjusted annual rate of 2,894,000. This is 3 percent above the revised January rate of 2,811,000 and is 23 percent above the February 2011 estimate of 2,362,000.

"February 2012 is the first month over the past twelve to show significant increases in residential remodeling activity across all U.S. regions," said Joe Emison, Vice President of Research and Development at BuildFax.

The BuildFax Remodeling Index (BFRI) is based on construction permits for residential remodeling projects filed with local building departments across the country. The index estimates the number of properties permitted. The national and regional indexes are based upon a subset of representative building departments in the U.S. and population estimates from the U.S. Census. The BFRI is seasonally-adjusted using the X12 procedure.

Click on graph for larger image.

This graph shows the Remodeling Index since January 2000 on a seasonally adjusted basis.

Remodeling is below the peak levels of the housing boom - with all the equity extraction - but up 25% from the bottom in May 2009.

Note: Permits are not adjusted by value, so this doesn't mean there is more money being spent, just more permit activity. Also some smaller remodeling projects are done without permits and the index will miss that activity.

The second graph shows the regional indexes. From BuildFax:

Seasonally-adjusted annual rates of remodeling across the country in February 2012 are estimated as follows: Northeast, 627,000 (up 24% from January and up 33% from February 2011); South, 1,194,000 (up 3% from January and up 25% from February 2011); Midwest, 516,000 (up 4% from January and up 22% from February 2011); West, 830,000 (up 9% from January and up 21% from February 2011).

Some of the increase in February could be weather related (the index is seasonally adjusted, and the weather in February was warmer than normal). This might especially be true in the Northeast.

For overall residential investment, multi-family construction and home improvement have already picked up, and it appears single family construction will increase in 2012.